联系我们

与泰克代表实时聊天。 工作时间:上午 9:00 - 下午 5:00(太平洋标准时间)。

电话

致电我们

工作时间:上午9:00-下午5:00(太平洋标准时间)

下载

下载手册、产品技术资料、软件等:

下载类型
型号或关键字

反馈

Why does the transition detector behave differently in the new TLA7Nx/Px logic analyzer modules compared to the older TLA7Lx/Mx logic analyzer modules?

问题:

Why does the transition detector behave differently in the new TLA7Nx/Px logic analyzer modules compared to the older TLA7Lx/Mx logic analyzer modules?

答案:

The LA modules can be programmed to recognize the transition of an individual channel or a group of channels. For example, "If Channel ABC Goes High then Trigger", or "If Group XYZ Changes then Trigger". Internally, this is done using a transition recognizer which compares values at consecutive sample points. Although you would expect the output of this transition recognizer to be "false" for the first sample in an acquisition (because there is not a previous sample to compare with), the transition recognizer output is actually sometimes "true" for the first sample. This means that if your trigger program is "If Channel ABC Goes High then Trigger" you may get a trigger on the first sample even though you would probably not expect this.

The workaround is to use a state in the trigger program to skip over the first sample, the sample for which the transition recognizer output is unreliable. The modified trigger program would look something like this:

State 1: If Anything then Go To State 2

State 2: If Channel ABC Goes High then Trigger


此常见问题适用于:

无产品系列

产品:

常见问题 ID 60261

查看所有常见问题 »